Why report cards get an F

Would you get an failing grade in decoding your child’s report card? Frustrated parents wonder what marks really mean.




This article was originally published in our February 2013.

Nine-year-old James Carr’s grades are neither terrible, nor amazing. Students at his Whitby, Ont., school are marked on a scale from A-plus to D-minus, and his report card is usually peppered with Bs and Cs. They’re decent marks, and his mom, Kathleen Crilly, would like to be happy with them. But she doesn’t quite understand what they’re for.

“I don’t know if he tried hard and still didn’t do well, or didn’t try at all,” she says. She describes his quarterly report cards as a list of marks and vague comments. Crilly calls James a “frustrating kid” — he usually aces tests, but he never does homework and rarely pays attention in class. His teachers have shared varying opinions of him: Some think he’s a genius, while others have implied he might have autism. Marks don’t give any insight into James’ learning process, says Crilly. “The report cards didn’t tell me anything I didn’t already know.”

Report cards are supposed to be a method for teachers to communicate with parents about how their child is performing. But in recent years, parents have complained that the multi-page documents sent home with their children are confusing and unhelpful. Things have gotten so bad that some parents and educators think elementary-school students shouldn’t get report cards at all.

“We need a new way of communicating progress in school,” says Tom Hierck, an educational consultant and former head of the British Columbia principals’ association. He cites a study that examined kids’ improvement levels after three types of feedback: letter and number grades; comments without grades; and a combination of comments and grades. The students who received clear, directive comments, without marks, are the only ones whose learning improved over time. All Canadian public schools use grades, but Hierck has visited some US schools that don’t. He believes individualized comments better address a student’s strengths and weaknesses. It’s often the parents who prefer letter and number grades.

Right now, Canadian report cards are full of teacher jargon. The Elk Island Public Schools,outside Edmonton, now include a four-page cheat sheet, which tells parents how to read its “outcomes-based report card,” on which “Achievement, Effort and Social Attributes” are each rated on a four level scale using words like “Proficient” and “Insufficient.” According to some teachers, a move toward euphemism — and away from honesty about a child’s weaknesses — is the main reason comments have become so murky.

Kevin* has spent five years as a teacher in Toronto. He used to write each of his 20-plus students an individual report card. But for the past three years, his school has provided teachers with a pre-approved list of report card comments to attach to the letter grades for each subject. Students are also evaluated on “learning skills” (mostly social skills and things like handing in homework) rated Excellent, Good, Satisfactory or Needs Improvement, accompanied by a canned comment. Kevin is told to focus on each student’s “strengths,” no matter how minor.

“It might be that the kid shows up to class on time,” he says. Students with challenges are told their “next steps,” which are couched in indirect phrasing. Getting a D in math, for example, might warrant the comment, “Will be given additional guided opportunities to add and subtract larger numbers.” Kevin explains: “That just means your kid can’t do math.” He spends much of his parent-teacher interview time translating comments. While higher-ups promise parents more clarity, “they’re the ones telling us to fill it up with jargon,” he says.

Report cards were a sore point in BC over the 2011/2012 school year, when union-led job action had teachers refusing to write them. It was stressful for mom Erin Brooks-Wilson, who lives in Halfmoon Bay, BC, and has four children from ages 11 to 17. “My kids definitely had an attitude of ‘who cares, we’re not getting graded anyway,’” she says. She’s the chair of her district parent-advisory council and believes report cards are a key motivational tool. “Kids get some sort of gratification out of report cards. I hate to see that lost.

”During the work-to-rule period, BC schools encouraged parents to arrange phone calls and interviews with teachers instead, but because teachers’ strike schedules didn’t extend past the last bell, it was impossible for many parents to do so. “I felt very out of the loop on how my children were doing,” says Brooks-Wilson.

Last year, Ottawa grade-five teacher Brenda* spent hours discussing one troubled student with his mother. “I couldn’t write ‘he sits there for two hours with his arms crossed and won’t say or do anything’ on the report card,” Brenda says. Accurate report cards are for internal school-system use, too, she says, and right now they fail as a way for teachers to get a quick summation of their new classes each fall. “If it takes half a year for a new teacher to figure out the issues, that child isn’t getting what he needs. My own report cards used to say, ‘Brenda chats too much with her friends during class and needs to focus,’” she recalls. “Now I’d have to say something like, ‘With reminding, Brenda is able to work effectively during class time.’” Clarity in comments has been a divisive issue between her union and the Ottawa public-school board — principals have the authority to soften or alter comments before they’re sent out to parents, but the union tells teachers they can refuse to sign cards if they don’t agree with the changes.

When it comes to making report cards better, there are plenty of suggestions. For James’ mom, Kathleen Crilly, it would resemble the rubric her seven-year-old daughter, Charlie, received last year after every major test. Each subject’s assignments and tests were stapled together, with a table on the front that showed marks and effort level for each step. “I could see where she scored well, and the comments were very clear,” says Crilly. “That was so helpful.” Brenda would like to see a yes-or-no checklist of specific skills, which would provide basic information, yet avoid the subjective and sometimes negative comments. Toronto teacher Kevin says, “I’d like to be able to write at least part of the report card from scratch. It’s hard, and it takes longer, but it’s focused on each kid.” Hierck, the former principal, wishes Canadian parents and schools were brave enough to ditch grades altogether. He’d like to see comments in readable language that celebrate successes and identify areas that need improvement.

“There’s a notion of security and comfort that comes with a known quantity, but if you dig into it, it’s hard to say what the difference is between a low B and a high C,” says Hierck. “We need to move away from a system created 150 years ago.”

This article appeared in our November 2012 issue with the headline “Needs Improvement,” pp. 70-72.

One comment on “Why report cards get an F

  1. I’ve seen both sides of this issue, as a former high school teacher and current parent of a child in elementary school. I’m not sure what the process is like now, but I know that when I was teaching high school in York Region, I had no ability to write comments. For each student in each class, I had 19 bubbles to fill in with a number 2 pencil – two bubbles for a grade out of 100, 5 bubbles for different learning skills, and 3 codes, four digits each, to select canned, pre-written comments. I don’t know who wrote those comments, but most of them were written by people with no idea what parents actually wanted to know about their kids.

    There were a few that had real content, but at least half of them were badly designed. For example, they might say “Needs to focus on the task at hand rather than socializing.” I had many students who did need to focus on the task at hand, but were not socializing instead. There is a long list of things a teenager can be doing other than what they’ve been told to do, and socializing is just one of the things. So, this comment was useful for a fraction of the situations where I really wanted to use it. A positive one that drove me crazy was “listens respectfully to the opinions of others and clearly and appropriately expresses own ideas verbally.” Those are both good things, and worth commenting on, but they don’t occur together as much as whoever wrote this comment might think. So many times I wanted to use half of that comment!

    As a young teacher, I was taught by my teacher-trainers to read past report cards from my students, especially those who are challenging to reach. After all, by the time kids hit grade 9, they’ve been in school for 10 years already. That’s a lot of colleagues who have worked with them before, and might have useful insights to share. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the comments we are allowed to put on report cards, this is not nearly as useful as it once was.

    As a parent with teaching experience, I completely understand all the “teacherese” on the report cards my daughter receives. It doesn’t help me any more than it helps you, because as parents suspect, there’s very little meaningful content hidden under that jargon.

    Parents and administrators need to look in the mirror, to understand where this has all come from. When parents read straightforward comments on a report card in the past, too many immediately picked up the phone to call an administrator at the school and complain about the teacher. School boards have reacted by forbidding teachers to use their own words, and write what they think. Until school boards are willing to trust teachers to “use their words” appropriately, and parents are willing to read and absorb those words without knee-jerk negative reactions, this is what we all get to live with.

    Of course, there will always be cranky teachers who write mean things on a report card if they’re allowed to do so, and angry parents who call the school at the drop of a hat. The rest of us need to make our voices heard, and not allow these outliers to continue to control all our fates. Boards of Education need to hear, loudly and clearly, that we want the unvarnished truth as our children’s teachers see it. Stop muzzling all teachers, because of a few teachers and parents who have ruined things for the rest of us.


Leave a comment

Sign in to comment.